|
|

THE WHITEROCKS DEPOSIT,
UTAH OIL SANDS.
Location & Access:
The Whiterocks Deposit lies on the northern flank of the Uinta
Basin, 27 miles north of Roosevelt, Duchesne County, and 30 miles
northwest of Vernal, Uinta County. The deposit is located near
the mouth of Whiterocks Canyon and is directly northwest of the
Littlewater Hills Deposit. The Whiterocks Deposit is in sections
17-19, T.2N., R1E and Section 24, T2N., R1W. (USM), Uintah County,
and covers an area of about 400 acres. The deposit is found on
the USGS Ice Cave Peak, 7.5 minute quadrangle. Access to the deposit
is via various county roads, either west from Vernal or north from
Roosevelt toward the town of White Rocks. From White Rocks, there
is a graded road which parallels the east side of Whiterocks River,
crossing the deposit.

Physiography & Land
Use:
The deposit is found within the marginal benches subsection of
the Uinta Mountains physiographic province. Bitumen-saturated sandstone
crops out on the east and west sides of Whiterocks Canyon and is
probably continuous beneath valley alluvium. The main part off
the deposit lies at an elevation of 7,200 feet. The valley area
is mostly private land surrounded on three sides by the Ashley
National Forest. To the south lies the Uinta and Ouray Reservations.
The Whiterocks River has eroded through the deposit, forming a
flood-plain as wide as 3,500 feet. The Whiterocks River is a major
tributary to the Duchesne and Green Rivers. The bitumen-saturated
and other formations form steep cliffs at the mouth of Whiterocks
Canyon. The west wall rises about 300 feet and the east wall rises
about 500 feet above the valley. (Petersen, 1985)
Geologic Setting:
Exposed strata consists primarily of steep, southeast-dipping
Triassic and Jurassic rocks. (See figure # 58.) At the mouth of
Whiterocks Canyon, the Wasatch Formation (Paleocene-Eocene) lies
uncomformably upon south-dipping rocks of the Mancos Shale and
Mesaverde Group (Cretaceous). The Navajo Sandstone (Jurassic) lies
uncomformably above the Chinle Formation (Triassic) and unconformably
below the Carmel Formation (Jurassic). Other formations exposed
in Whiterocks Canyon include Precambrian, Cambrian, Mississippian,
Pennsylvanian, Permian, Triassic and Jurassic age rocks.
The Navajo Sandstone, which is also called
the Nugget Sandstone in northeastern Utah, is bitumen-saturated
in and around Whiterocks Canyon. The Navajo is divided into two
units; a thin-bedded lower unit, and a highly-cross-stratified
upper unit (Uyger & Picard,
1985). The Navajo is mostly of eolian origin, deposited in dune
fields and interdune environments. (Picard, 1975; Uyger, 1983).
The enclosing Chinle and the Carmel Formations are comprised mainly
of impervious shales that may have acted to seal in oil migrating
into the Navajo. The deposit is associated with the crest of a
steep, south-plunging anticlimal nose (Whiterocks anticline) that
subparallels the Whiterocks River. The influence of this structure
on bitumen saturation is unknown. Covington (1963) suggested several
theories about the origin of the oil. He favored a Pennsylvanian
age for the oil migrating from the Weber Sandstone. He also suggested
the Green River Formation (Eocene) as a possible source due to
similarities in chemical analyses. Sulfur isotopes (Mauger and
others, 1973) support this theory.
The bitumen-saturated zone occurs almost
entirely within the Navajo Sandstone, and is about 900 feet thick.
The deposit strikes N65E for about 1.5 miles. The outcrop is
covered on both sides by the Duchesne River Formation. (Eocene-Oligocene).
The Navajo is a consolidated, fine-grained, and well-sorted subarkose.
Poorly sorted zones of sandstone with a bimodal grain-size distribution
are also present. Mineralogically, the Navajo Sandstone is mature
and relatively uniform, with varying amounts of clays, iron oxides
and carbonate cements. Shale, siltstone and calcareous zones
are uncommon. Fracturing is common, although orientation is variable.
The degree of bitumen saturation is dependent on permeability
and is therefore not uniform. Barren zones are adjacent to rich
zones. Numerous resource estimates have been calculated for the
Whiterocks Deposit. Severy (1943) estimated resources of 9.52
million barrels based on outcrop mapping. Based upon the results
of 11 core-holes, Shirley (1961) calculated total resources of
105 million barrels. Of this total, Shirley classified 57 million
barrels as proven reserves and 27 million barrels as probable
resources. Covington (1963), using existing core-hole data and
results of surface mapping, estimated approximately 50 million
barrels. Lewin and Associates (1984) reported a measured resource
of 60 million barrels in-place for 200 acres, with speculative
resources of another 60 million barrels on 200 acres, calculating
600 feet of saturation. Peterson (1985) suggested that the deposit
contains more than 100 million barrels of oil in-place. Campbell
(1975) calculated 37.3 million barrels of oil in-place, assuming
182 acres with 500 vertical feet of saturation. Ritzma (1979) classified
the deposit as “very large” with 65 to 125 million barrels of oil
in-place. From this, he categorized 50 million barrels as measured,
15 million barrels as indicated and the remainder inferred.
It is interesting to note that the lower portion of the Duchesne
River Formation, which overlies the eastern extent of the deposit,
contains saturated pebbles of Navajo Sandstone. Bitumen occurs
in the Duchesne River Formation, however, only along the contact
with the Navajo Sandstone. This might indicate that oil migration
was prior to deposition of the Duchesne River Formation.

Bitumen Analyses:
Wood and Ritzma (1972) reported standard analyses of bitumen samples
from the deposit, and Mauger and others (1973) presented data for
sulfur isotopes.
Development History:
Peterson (1985) reported the results of exploratory drilling and
presented a brief synopsis of development activities. Tar-sand
exploration and development at Whiterocks until the 1940's was
limited to small mining operations in pits and adits. In 1957 and
1958, three exploratory wells were drilled along the trend of the
deposit in an effort to find liquid crude oil. Two extraction plants
were constructed in the early 1960's and used hot water and solvents
in their processes. Also in the early 1960's, White Rocks Oil Properties
of Salt Lake City drilled 11 core holes in the deposit; nine of
these drill holes reportedly penetrated the entire bitumen-saturated
interval. Western Industries of Las Vegas, Nevada opened a strip-mine
and built a pilot plant along the east side of the Whiterocks River
apparently in the late 1960's. Major Oil Company, in the early
1970's, opened a strip-mine and built a pilot plant on the west
side off the Whiterocks River (Peterson, 1985). Although other
companies conducted exploratory work in the early 1980's, no other
processing facilities were constructed. The quarry on the west
side of the Whiterocks River is now being mined by Duchesne County
for highway paving use.
SOURCE; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY.
Utah 's Tar Sand Resource consists of eight
major deposits with a combined shallow oil resource of 32.0 billion
barrels of oil. The largest of these deposits, the Tar Sand Triangle
as it is known, covers an area of 148,000 acres and is located
in Wayne and Garfield Counties, between the Dirty Devil and Colorado
Rivers.
| CLICK IMAGE FOR LARGER VIEW |
 |
 |
 |
| Field Outline May-Asphalt
Ridge |
Cross Section-Asphalt
Ridge |
Field Richness Map-Asphalt
Ridge |
| UTAH TAR SAND SUMMARY |
|
| Tar Sand Triangle 16.0 billion bbl |
Sunnyside 6.0 billion bbl |
| P.R. Spring 4.5 billion bbl |
Asphalt Ridge 1.5 billion bbl |
| Hill Creek 1.2 billion bbl |
Circle Ridge 1.1 billion bbl |
| Other Deposits 1.4 billion bbl |
White Rocks 0.3 billion bbl |
| |
Total Shallow Oil 32.0 billion bbl |
The Utah Tar Sands
have been quarried since the early 1900's primarily for road
paving material. Several pilot extraction tests have been operated
by oil companies at various times since 1972. The most recent
reported pilot tests at Asphalt Ridge were conducted by the Laramie
Energy Technology Center of the U.S. Department of Energy.
In 1975 through 1978 they completed experimental testing of a
combined reverse-forward combustion and steam injection scheme
. It was concluded that additional testing of these methods was
necessary.
Efforts to develop Utah 's
heavy oil primarily ended with the sharp drop in oil prices in
the mid-1980's and the high costs of extraction due to inefficient
processing technologies. The Joint Venture Partnership and their
patented extraction technology is presently focusing on the Asphalt
Ridge Deposit because of its unusual richness. It has an average
oil saturation of 48% and is very low in sulphur content at 0.4%
by weight.
The determination of the geological interpretation
and well data were used to determine the measured and speculative
field outlines. The well data consisted of 18 cores available
from past drilling by the U.S. Government
of Energy and private companies.
| RESERVOIR PROPERTIES - ASPHALT RIDGE |
| Depth in feet 20 - 600 |
| Porosity % 27 |
| Permeability (md) 1000+ |
| OIL SATURATION
(%) |
| Maximum: 60 |
| Average 48 |
The two outcrops contain the richest areas of the measured
field. Richness varies from 300 to more than 100 barrels per
acre-foot. The net pay ranges from 35 to 50 feet.
The measured resource in-place at Asphalt
Ridge is estimated to be 0.8 billion barrels underlying 29,000
acres. The speculative resource in-place is estimated to be 0.3
billion barrels under 22,000 surface acres. (All estimates from
the Department of Energy , U.S. Government.)
ASPHALT RIDGE
DISTRIBUTION OF RICHNESS & NET
PAY
| Resource |
Barrels per Acre/Foot |
Net Pay Feet |
| Contour |
Range |
Avg. |
Range |
Avg. |
| Measured Area: |
| 60,000+ B/A |
700-1200 |
850 |
25-83 |
50 |
| 20-60,000 B/A |
580- 950 |
775 |
22-100 |
35 |
| 0-20,000 B/A |
300-1000 |
400 |
7-60 |
35 |
| Speculative Area:
|
| 0-20,000 B/A |
|
400* |
|
35* |
| *Assumed the same as measured area
contour.
|
ASPHALT RIDGE
SUMMARY OF RESOURCE-IN
PLACE
| Resource |
Barrels |
Areal |
Resource |
| Contour |
Per Acre Avg. |
Extent Acres |
In Place MMB |
| Measured Area |
| 60,000+ B/A |
40,000 |
3,200 |
190 |
| 20-60,000 B/A |
28.000 |
11,000 |
440 |
| 0-20,000 B/A |
14,000 |
14,700 |
200 |
| Total: |
28,900 |
830 |
| Speculative
Area: |
| 0-20,000 B/A |
14,000 |
22,000 |
310 |
|
|